Through Literature, the author is often able to express his or her views about society. She incorporates this, as well as her knowledge of various philosophers to create a novel that upon completion has one questioning is Man molded by society, or rather is it society that shapes Man. Mary Shelley suggest through her literary work, that Man, as symbolized through the monster, is born innately good, but society corrupts and influences him.
Man as a Social Animal Article shared by: Man is a social animal and that, he loves Society mould man live in society with other human beings, is a general conception about his basic behavioural pattern.
Almost all sociological thinkers agree that there is a very close relation between the individual and the society. Whether any particular individual could have been nurtured under conditions in which there did not exist any society is a different question; but the fact remains that without a social environment, be it his home, his community or his state, no stability would be brought to his status as an individual.
One would almost conclude from the foregoing statement that the individual is a product of society. Instantly, other thinkers would raise a hue and cry that the truth is just the contrary, that is, the society is the product of an individual and another.
As McIver says, it may be pointless to enter into the controversy as to whether the individual came before the society, or the society came before the individual. We would like rather to concentrate our attention on the causes of the growth of the society and the role of the individual in it.
Quite naturally, therefore, man wanted to escape from the condition and a relation was consequently built up between human beings in the form of a social contract.
The contract not only established a relation between them, but each individual suffered in himself a demolition of irresponsibility and brutish behaviour. Gradually, when population increased and the concept of personal property was gaining recognition, in order to protect himself, man voluntarily made the social contract.
Individual will was then, for collective good, made subject to collective will. John Locke, too, believed that the pre-contract state of society was the state of nature in which peace and harmony prevailed and every man was born free. In that sense, the theory is basically a political thought and, as McIver quite righty points out, the theory is not based on any analysis of historical facts.
Besides that, the theory separates the individual from the society and would almost make the assumption of the existence of the individual before the society. Sociologists do not agree that man could ever have lived without a social consciousness. Spencer holds that society can be likened to a physical organism that exhibits the same kind of unity that an individual organism shows, and it is subject to similar laws of development, maturity and decay.
The limbs and organs would be the different associations and institutions.
Like Spencer and the Bluntschli, even some thinkers of this century like Oswald Spengler in The Decline of the West subscribe to the organismic theory, though with certain modifications. Some modify the theory in order to explain the analogy only so far as the organic processes of birth, youth, maturity, old age and death are concerned.
Spengler, finds an organic cycle in societies that pass from birth to death. To these thinkers, the individual is a mere manifestation of organism that is society, and his entire life and will must be subjected to it.
Spencer, however, explains his theory by allowing the individual more of independent attributes; he thinks that though the individual and the society are one, each has his own set of actions and individuals collectively execute their functions in the interest of the society.
Just as a biological organism cannot function healthily if any part of it is weak or strained, a society too depends on the harmonized activities of all individuals.
Sociologists in general do not find the organismic theory as entirely satisfactory, since a comparison between an organic cell and a human individual is stretched too far.
An individual has a self; he can think for himself independently of society, which process is unthinkable in the case of a mere cell. Besides that, the organismic theory stresses the importance of social unity to such an extent that individual qualities are underscored or even obliterated. If one would speak of the interests of a society, even in terms of social unity, one cannot but refer to such interests as are felt by every individual in such society.
Therefore, the organismic theory is best understood as long as it recognizes the fact of reliance of the individual upon the society, and it would be wrong to stretch the comparison any further than that.Man as a Social Animal.
Article the individual from the society and would almost make the assumption of the existence of the individual before the society. Sociologists do not agree that man could ever have lived without a social consciousness.
It is undeniable that the society, even the primitive one, shapes and moulds the course of. Society Mold on Men Essay Sample. Society has placed a mold on the role that men are supposed to play, what men are supposed to do, and how they are supposed to act in their culture.
Society Mould Man And Man Mould Society. Man and Society Somebody said “The problem of man cannot be solved scientifically without a clear statement of the relationship between man and society”.
In the family the individual abandons some of his specific features to become a member of the whole. Free College Essay Is Man Molded by Society, or Does Society Mold Man?. Is Man Molded by Society, or Does Society Mold Man? Through Literature, the author is often able to express his. The relation between individual and society is very close.
Essentially, “society” is the regularities, customs and ground rules of antihuman behavior. These practices are tremendously important to know how humans act and interact with each other.
Society does not exist independently without individual. The individual lives and acts within society but society is nothing, in spite of the. I saw—with shut eyes, but acute mental vision—I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together.
I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life and stir with an uneasy, half-vital motion.